Dripify Pricing 2026 With Plans, Limits and Cost Per Lead

Dripify pricing runs $59, $79 or $99 per user per month billed monthly, dropping to $39, $59 or $79 per user per month if you pay for a year up front. There is a seven-day free trial of the top self-serve plan with no credit card, every plan includes 100 email finder credits a month, and an Enterprise tier is quoted on request. All figures here were pulled from Dripify's own pricing page in August 2026.

The sticker prices are the easy part. The number that actually decides what Dripify costs you is not on the plan cards in a form you can compare, because Dripify is a LinkedIn tool and LinkedIn, not Dripify, sets how many people one seat can reach in a day. Once you divide the price by that ceiling, the ladder ranks differently than the feature bullets suggest.

Dripify pricing plans in 2026

Plan	Billed monthly	Annual (per user, per month)	Annual total per user	Annual saving
Basic	$59	$39	$468	34%
Pro	$79	$59	$708	25%
Advanced	$99	$79	$948	20%
Enterprise	Custom quote, adds premium onboarding, a customer success manager and a custom mail finder

Every price is per user. That matters more here than on most tools in this category, because the competing cold email platforms increasingly give seats away and charge for volume instead. A five-person team on Dripify Pro is $295 a month on annual billing, or $3,540 a year, before anyone buys a single extra email finder credit.

Note the discount curve. Annual billing saves 34% on Basic, 25% on Pro and 20% on Advanced. The commitment is worth most on the cheapest plan and least on the most expensive one, which is the reverse of the usual structure where vendors push their high tiers hardest.

What is the difference between Dripify Basic, Pro and Advanced?

Basic gives you one drip campaign, reduced daily quotas and the core analytics. Pro removes the campaign limit, raises the quotas to the full ceiling, and adds a dedicated inbox, CSV export, webhooks and a HubSpot integration. Advanced keeps Pro's quotas exactly as they are and adds team management, lead tagging, step-level analytics, evergreen leads, A/B testing and what Dripify calls advanced LinkedIn protection.

Read that again, because it is the single most useful thing to know before you pick a tier: Advanced does not raise your daily limits. Pro and Advanced share the same quotas. The extra $20 a user each month buys management and safety features, not throughput. If you are upgrading because you want to reach more people, you will be disappointed.

How many people can one Dripify seat actually reach?

This is where the real cost lives. Dripify publishes daily quotas per plan because LinkedIn enforces its own activity limits and any tool that ignores them gets its users restricted.

Daily limit	Basic	Pro	Advanced
Connection requests	20	75	75
Messages	30	100+	100+
Sales Navigator InMails	10	30	30
Profile views	100	200+	200+

Across roughly 22 working days, 20 connection requests a day works out at about 440 a month per seat and 75 a day at about 1,650. Those are the numbers the pricing page implies, and for most accounts the second one is not reachable.

The ceiling Dripify does not set is LinkedIn's weekly invitation limit

LinkedIn caps how many connection invitations any account can send in a rolling seven-day window. For most accounts that cap sits at roughly 100 invitations a week, which is about 430 a month. LinkedIn does not publish the number, and it is not fixed: accounts with unusually strong engagement have reported ceilings closer to 200 a week, and new or lightly used accounts get less. But the figure is consistent across every LinkedIn tool vendor and outreach practitioner who has measured it, and no subscription raises it. Sales Navigator does not raise it either.

That single fact reranks the plans, because a tool's advertised daily limit describes what its software will attempt, not what LinkedIn will accept. Dripify Basic's 20 requests a day already puts you at roughly 440 a month, which is essentially the platform ceiling. Pro and Advanced advertise 75 a day, but the extra capacity has nowhere to go. Here is the same cost-per-request table with the realistic denominator:

Plan (annual billing)	Price per user, per month	Advertised requests per month	Realistic requests per month	Realistic cost per request
Basic	$39	~440	~430	9.1 cents
Pro	$59	~1,650	~430	13.7 cents
Advanced	$79	~1,650	~430	18.4 cents

Read that carefully before you upgrade. On the advertised numbers, Pro looks like the obvious value tier at 3.6 cents a request against Basic's 8.9. Against LinkedIn's real ceiling the ranking flips: every tier delivers about the same reach, so Basic is the cheapest request and each step up costs more per request, not less. What Pro and Advanced genuinely buy is features, not throughput. Pro unlocks unlimited drip campaigns (Basic allows exactly one), a dedicated inbox, CSV export and the webhook and HubSpot integrations. Advanced adds multi-team management, lead tagging, A/B testing and evergreen leads. Those are worth paying for on their own merits. Just do not upgrade expecting to send four times as many invitations, because LinkedIn will not let you.

The exception is a team. Because Dripify bills per user and LinkedIn caps per account, the only honest way to raise total reach is more seats on more LinkedIn accounts. Five seats gets you to roughly 2,150 invitations a month, and on annual Pro that costs $295. Capacity on this channel is bought in people, not in plan tiers.

For reference, here is what the advertised math looked like before the platform cap is applied:

Plan (annual billing)	Price per user, per month	Connection requests per month	Cost per request
Basic	$39	~440	8.9 cents
Pro	$59	~1,650	3.6 cents
Advanced	$79	~1,650	4.8 cents

On the advertised quotas alone, Basic is the most expensive way to buy a connection request at roughly two and a half times Pro's rate, and Advanced costs a third more per request than Pro for identical advertised throughput. That is the analysis most comparison articles stop at. It is only correct if LinkedIn lets you use the quota, and for the large majority of accounts it does not.

One more thing that pricing tables never say out loud: a connection request is not a conversation. Acceptance rates on cold LinkedIn requests are commonly in the tens of percent, and you generally cannot message someone until they accept. So the number of people you actually get to speak to each month is a fraction of that 430, and your real cost per conversation is several times the cost per request. Budget against acceptances, not against the quota.

Dripify email finder credits and what they cost

Every Dripify plan includes 100 email finder credits a month, which is enough to test the feature and not much else. Additional credits are sold in packs:

Credit pack	Price	Cost per credit
1,000 credits	$29	2.9 cents
2,000 credits	$49	2.5 cents
5,000 credits	$69	1.4 cents
10,000 credits	$99	1.0 cents

The volume curve is steep. The 10,000 pack costs about a third as much per credit as the 1,000 pack, so buying in small batches is genuinely wasteful if you know you will use them. Weigh these against a dedicated finder before you commit, since standalone providers often price similar volumes lower and you are not locked into Dripify's seat count to use them.

Is there a Dripify free trial or free plan?

There is a seven-day free trial with Advanced-plan features and no credit card required, and there is no permanent free plan. Seven days is short for this category. Because LinkedIn quotas cap you at 75 requests a day and acceptances take days to arrive, a week is barely enough to see a first reply, let alone judge reply quality. Plan the trial before you start it: have your list, your ICP filter and your message sequence ready on day one.

What Dripify pricing does not include

Dripify sends email as well as LinkedIn messages, and this is where buyers get caught. There is no mailbox warm-up and no inbox rotation layer in the product. For a handful of emails a day from one well-established mailbox that is fine. For the volume most people mean when they say cold email, sending without warm-up and rotation is how a sending domain gets burned, and replacing a burned domain costs far more than any plan on this page. If email is going to be a real channel for you, price a dedicated sender alongside Dripify rather than assuming the email steps replace one. Our Woodpecker vs Dripify comparison works through that trade-off side by side, and the wider cold email versus LinkedIn outreach breakdown covers when each channel is worth funding at all.

If you are still choosing rather than budgeting, the two matchups worth reading are Lemlist vs Dripify, which works through the point where a flat unlimited-user email plan beats per-seat LinkedIn pricing, and Woodpecker vs Dripify for the same question from the deliverability side, plus Instantly vs Dripify, where the contrast is between a sending limit you can pay to raise and a LinkedIn cap you cannot, and Saleshandy vs Dripify, which puts the cheapest high-volume email plan against the same fixed LinkedIn ceiling. If you have already decided to move, Dripify alternatives matches seven replacements to the reason you are leaving. For the wider field, we priced seven vendors in best LinkedIn automation tools.

Two smaller notes. Dripify's original domain, dripify.io, now redirects to dripify.com, so older links and older pricing screenshots you find in comparison articles may not reflect the current page. And the Enterprise tier is quoted rather than published, which in practice means multi-team deployments should expect a negotiation rather than a checkout.

Who is Dripify priced for?

The per-seat model tells you the answer: small teams where each person owns their own LinkedIn account and their own pipeline. That is founders, agency account managers, and recruiters. Recruiters are a large share of it, because LinkedIn is simply where candidates are, and if sourcing is the reason you are buying seats then the expensive step is not the outreach at all but everything after the reply, which is a first-round screening interview problem rather than a sending one.

Where the model works against you is volume outbound. Because throughput is fixed per seat by LinkedIn and price is charged per seat, the only way to reach more people is to buy more seats and more LinkedIn accounts, and each of those carries its own restriction risk. Cold email scales the opposite way: mailboxes are cheap, seats are often free, and the constraint is your own sending reputation rather than a platform's rulebook. If you are comparing total cost across both models, the cold email software pricing comparison puts the main tools on one table.

What Dripify costs a team, seat by seat

Dripify bills per user on every tier and one seat connects one LinkedIn account, so the bill scales in a straight line with headcount. Reach scales with it too, because LinkedIn allows roughly 100 connection invitations per account per rolling week, about 430 a month. This is what that looks like on annual billing.

Seats	Basic a month	Pro a month	Advanced a month	New invitations a month
1	$39	$59	$79	About 430
3	$117	$177	$237	About 1,290
5	$195	$295	$395	About 2,150
10	$390	$590	$790	About 4,300

Read the last column before the price columns. Moving from Basic to Advanced on the same number of seats buys unlimited campaigns, team management, A/B testing and stronger account protection. It does not move the invitation number at all, because that limit belongs to LinkedIn. The only way to raise reach is another seat, another LinkedIn account and another real person willing to have automation running on their profile.

Compare Dripify pricing against the alternatives

Dripify sits in the middle of the LinkedIn automation market on price and near the bottom on data included. Put the per-account monthly cost side by side on annual billing and the ranking is not what the plan cards suggest.

Tool	Per account a month, annual billing	Data included	Branding for clients
Dripify Advanced	$79	100 email finder credits a month	None at any tier
Dripify Basic	$39	100 email finder credits a month	None
HeyReach Growth	$63 per sender	100 enrichment credits per sender	None on this tier
HeyReach Agency	About $32 at 25 senders ($799 flat)	1,000 enrichment credits	White label included
Expandi Business	$79 per account	Dedicated country-based IP per account	Agency tier quoted on request
Apollo Professional	$79 per seat	48,000 credits per seat a year	None

Two comparisons are worth sitting with. HeyReach Growth is cheaper per account than Dripify Advanced on annual billing and is built for running many accounts at once, so a team past a handful of LinkedIn profiles should price both; our HeyReach vs Dripify comparison shows the flat Agency block undercutting Dripify Advanced from eleven accounts, and our Expandi vs Dripify comparison covers the one tool priced exactly like Advanced that sells extra weekly invitations instead. And Apollo Professional charges the exact same $79 a seat while granting roughly 4,000 data credits a month against Dripify's 100, which is the argument laid out in full in our Apollo vs Dripify comparison. If you are buying on behalf of clients rather than for your own team, the branded options and what they cost per client account are covered in our guide to white label LinkedIn automation pricing.

Every figure here was read from each vendor's own pricing page in September 2026. This category reprices often, so check the current page before you commit to an annual term.

Is Dripify worth the money?

If LinkedIn is genuinely where your buyers respond and email is not, Pro on annual billing at $59 per user is a fair price for what it does, and it is the tier to pick rather than Basic. If you are buying it as a cheaper way to do cold email, it is the wrong tool at any price, because the two things that make cold email work at volume, warm-up and inbox rotation, are not in the product. And if the honest answer is that you have not decided which channel to fund yet, decide that first. The tool is a much smaller decision than the channel.

Verify current pricing on Dripify's own page before you buy. Per-seat SaaS pricing moves, and the figures above are a snapshot from August 2026. If the other tool you are weighing is an inbox add-on rather than another LinkedIn platform, Yesware vs Dripify puts the per-seat costs and the real ceilings side by side. If it is a full sales engagement platform with LinkedIn steps inside the cadence, Klenty vs Dripify covers that, and the Klenty pricing guide explains why LinkedIn there starts at the $70 seat. And if the other half of the budget question is cold email volume rather than another per-seat tool, Smartlead vs Dripify sets a per-workspace sender with unlimited mailboxes against Dripify per-user model. If you are weighing Dripify against a suite that already includes a finder and an email sender, Snov.io vs Dripify prices a Snov.io LinkedIn slot against a Dripify seat, and recruiters can read Dripify for recruitment for what a sourcing desk actually pays. If the cheaper option on your shortlist is Waalaxy, Waalaxy vs Dripify shows that Waalaxy keeps cold email on its 69 euro Business plan while every Dripify seat includes it, and Dux-Soup vs Dripify shows Dux-Soup has no email step at all and now starts at $41.25 a seat, and Linked Helper vs Dripify shows the cheapest seat in the category, $8.25 on a 12 month license, still needs your computer or a VPS running. PhantomBuster vs Dripify covers the workspace-priced alternative, Meet Alfred vs Dripify covers the one that is cheaper on annual billing, and Dripify email automation breaks down the 50 and 200 a day email caps behind each plan.