Expandi vs Dripify: pricing, weekly LinkedIn limits and which is better
The short answer
Expandi and Dripify are both cloud LinkedIn automation tools with a dedicated IP per account, and at the top of Dripify's range they cost the same: Expandi Business is $99 per LinkedIn account a month, or $79 on annual billing, and Dripify Advanced is $99 or $79 per user. Dripify also sells cheaper seats, $39 on Basic and $59 on Pro annually, with email steps and 100 email finder credits a month on every plan. What Expandi sells for the higher entry price is reach: its Mobile Connector campaign type adds up to 100 connection requests a week on top of LinkedIn's usual limit of about 100. Buy Dripify for most reps. Buy Expandi when weekly invitations are the bottleneck. AutoMail is the email channel neither one is built to run.
AutoMail researches and writes the 1:1 sequence right here. It runs in your browser, so no email goes out.
Type a real prospect and AutoMail writes the sequence here, from what you enter. On your list the AI does the research for you.
Live, interactive · personalized · no card needed
Permission-based B2B outreach · 1-click unsubscribe in every send · deliverability protected
Quick verdict
Who each tool is for
Both Expandi and Dripify are capable. Here is the shortest honest way to choose, with where AutoMail fits.
Pick Dripify
Most individual reps and small teams. Pro at $59 a seat on annual billing gives unlimited campaigns, a dedicated IP, email steps in the sequence and 100 email finder credits a month, which is $20 a month less than Expandi for the same channel. Basic at $39 covers one campaign at light volume.
Pick Expandi
LinkedIn invitations are the constraint on your pipeline and each account is worth protecting: a founder, a senior AE, a recruiter with a strong network. The Mobile Connector adds up to 100 requests a week beyond the usual limit, and the Agency plan adds white label from ten seats.
Pick AutoMail
LinkedIn is handled and the email channel is the gap. The AI researches each company, writes the opener and follow-ups for that prospect, warms and rotates your own sending inboxes, pauses the moment someone replies and sends interested prospects your booking link. Flat per workspace, from $39 a month on annual billing.
Expandi and Dripify look alike on the surface. Both run LinkedIn campaigns on their own servers, so nothing depends on a browser tab staying open, both tie each account to a dedicated IP address, and both run email follow-ups inside the same sequence as connection requests and messages. Buyers usually shortlist them together for exactly that reason, then get stuck because the feature lists read almost the same.
The prices do not. Dripify charges per user on three published tiers: Basic $39, Pro $59 and Advanced $79 a month on annual billing, or $59, $79 and $99 monthly. Expandi publishes one plan, Business, at $99 per LinkedIn account a month or $79 on annual billing, and quotes an Agency plan from ten seats with white label on a call. So Expandi's entry price is Dripify's top price, and a rep who would be fine on Dripify Pro pays $20 a month more on Expandi.
The reason to pay that gap is the weekly ceiling. LinkedIn allows most accounts roughly 100 connection invitations per rolling week, whatever a tool advertises per day. Dripify lists up to 75 requests a day on Pro and Advanced, but LinkedIn's weekly limit binds long before that. Expandi's pricing page says its Mobile Connector campaign type lets an account send an additional 100 connection requests a week. If that holds for your account, the same $79 buys about twice the invitations, which is the only line on either pricing page that changes how many prospects you reach.
Side by side
Expandi vs Dripify vs AutoMail
Pricing verified September 2026. Capabilities change, so check each vendor for the latest before you buy.
| What matters | Expandi | Dripify | AutoMail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built for | LinkedIn outreach where account safety and weekly reach matter most | Individual sellers and small teams, one LinkedIn account per seat | Writing and sending personalized cold email that books meetings |
| Pricing model | Per LinkedIn account; one published plan plus a quoted Agency plan | Per user on three published tiers plus Enterprise | Flat per workspace, unlimited seats |
| Entry price | Business $99 per account monthly, $79 annual | Basic $59 per user monthly, $39 annual (one campaign) | Starter $49 a month flat, $39 on annual billing |
| Working tier | Business is the only published tier | Pro $79 monthly, $59 annual; Advanced $99 monthly, $79 annual | Growth $99 a month flat, $79 on annual billing |
| Cost for 5 accounts, annual | $395 a month | $295 on Pro, $395 on Advanced | Not applicable, email only |
| Weekly invitation ceiling | LinkedIn's usual ~100 a week, plus up to 100 more through the Mobile Connector campaign type | Up to 20 a day on Basic, 75 on Pro and Advanced; LinkedIn still allows about 100 a week | Bounded by safe per-mailbox email limits across rotated inboxes |
| Campaigns | Unlimited, with campaign prioritization | 1 on Basic, unlimited from Pro | Unlimited sequences |
| Account safety | Dedicated country-based IP, profile auto warm-up, limit ranges it will not exceed | Dedicated IP per account, randomized timing; adaptive activity control and advanced protection on Advanced | Not applicable; sends from your own warmed mailboxes |
| Email sending | Email follow-ups inside the LinkedIn sequence | LinkedIn and email in one sequence on every paid plan | The core product, with warm-up, rotation and a spam check before each send |
| Email finder | Not listed on the pricing page | 100 credits per user every month; sending is not metered | None, bring or sync your own verified list |
| Paid add-ons | Image and GIF personalization at extra cost; video through a paid Sendspark integration | Email finder credit packs | None, everything is in the plan |
| Agencies and white label | Agency plan quoted from 10 seats: roles, client reports, own branding | No white label; Advanced adds multi-team management | Separate client workspaces on Agency |
| Free trial | 7 days, all features | 7 days with Advanced features, no card | No free plan |
| AI copywriting | Templates, dynamic placeholders and If/Action sequences; you write the message | Sequence templates and profile variables; you write the message | Researches each prospect and writes the whole sequence |
| Platform risk | LinkedIn prohibits third-party automation; sending beyond the usual weekly limit raises the stakes | LinkedIn prohibits third-party automation, and restrictions land on the rep's own profile | Your own mailboxes and domains, with warm-up and rotation built in |
Comparison reflects publicly available pricing and positioning as of September 2026. Company and product names are trademarks of their respective owners.
The third option
Where AutoMail fits between them
The AI writes the sequence
Both tools above leave the copy to you. AutoMail researches each prospect and writes a genuine 1:1 opener and follow-ups, so relevance, not just volume, drives the reply rate.
Deliverability built in
Inbox rotation, gradual warm-up and a spam-score check on every send keep personalized copy in the primary inbox, built for the 2026 Google and Microsoft sender rules.
Replies become meetings
When a prospect answers, the sequence pauses, intent is classified, and meeting-ready replies route to your booking link and CRM. Flat per workspace, unlimited seats, no credits.
One honest caveat: AutoMail has no built-in lead database, so bring or sync your own verified list. If prospecting data is what you need most, keep a data tool for that and run the outreach here.
Good questions
Expandi vs Dripify, answered
Keep comparing
More head-to-head comparisons
Instantly vs Smartlead
The two most popular cold email platforms, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs InstantlyLemlist vs Instantly
Multichannel personalization versus high-volume email, compared, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs SmartleadLemlist vs Smartlead
Multichannel personalization versus scale and white-label, compared, plus a third option.
Saleshandy vs SmartleadSaleshandy vs Smartlead
Two flat-priced senders with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.
QuickMail vs InstantlyQuickMail vs Instantly
Unlimited seats and senders versus bundled lead data, compared, plus a third option.
Woodpecker vs SmartleadWoodpecker vs Smartlead
Pay-per-prospect versus flat unlimited sending, compared, plus a third option.
Reply.io vs LemlistReply.io vs Lemlist
Two multichannel platforms that both now sell unlimited-user email plans, priced from both vendors in September 2026.
Klenty vs SalesloftKlenty vs Salesloft
An affordable sales engagement tool versus an enterprise revenue platform, compared, plus a third option.
Instantly vs SaleshandyInstantly vs Saleshandy
Two high-volume cold email platforms with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Klenty vs QuickMailKlenty vs QuickMail
A per-user sales engagement tool with a database versus a flat-priced sender with unlimited seats, compared, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs MailshakeLemlist vs Mailshake
Two multichannel sales engagement tools with built-in lead data, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Woodpecker vs QuickMailWoodpecker vs QuickMail
Two deliverability-first cold email tools with very different pricing models, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Saleshandy vs QuickMailSaleshandy vs QuickMail
Two flat-priced cold email tools with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Mailshake vs SaleshandyMailshake vs Saleshandy
Per-seat sales engagement versus flat unlimited-inbox sending, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Apollo vs InstantlyApollo vs Instantly
A B2B database with sequencing versus a deliverability-first sender, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Smartlead vs ApolloSmartlead vs Apollo
A deliverability-first sender versus a B2B contact database with sequencing, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Snov.io vs Hunter.ioSnov.io vs Hunter.io
Two find-verify-and-send suites compared on credits, seats and sending caps, plus a third option.
Woodpecker vs DripifyWoodpecker vs Dripify
An email sender that added LinkedIn versus a LinkedIn tool that added email, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs DripifyLemlist vs Dripify
Unlimited-user email against per-seat LinkedIn automation, with the cap LinkedIn actually enforces.
Apollo vs Snov.ioApollo vs Snov.io
A per-seat sales database versus an unlimited-seat find-and-send suite, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs ApolloLemlist vs Apollo
Flat unlimited-user email against a per-seat sales platform, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Apollo vs Hunter.ioApollo vs Hunter.io
A 210M-contact database billed per seat against a precision finder billed per plan, plus a third option.
Saleshandy vs ApolloSaleshandy vs Apollo
A workspace-priced sender with its own 852M-contact database against a per-seat sales platform, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs ClayLemlist vs Clay
A flat unlimited-user sequencer against a credit-metered data engine, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Saleshandy vs LemlistSaleshandy vs Lemlist
Two multichannel tools that meter opposite things, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Instantly vs DripifyInstantly vs Dripify
Email volume you can buy more of against LinkedIn reach that money cannot raise.
Saleshandy vs DripifySaleshandy vs Dripify
Email volume you can buy more of against LinkedIn reach that money cannot raise.
Yesware vs DripifyYesware vs Dripify
Two cheap seats, two hidden ceilings: 20 recipients a month against 100 LinkedIn invites a week.
Klenty vs DripifyKlenty vs Dripify
A per-seat sales engagement platform against a per-seat LinkedIn robot, priced from both vendors on the same day.
Smartlead vs DripifySmartlead vs Dripify
A high-volume email sender against a per-seat LinkedIn robot, priced from both vendor pages on the same day.
Snov.io vs DripifySnov.io vs Dripify
An email-first suite that sells LinkedIn as a per-slot add-on against a LinkedIn tool that bundles a little email, priced from both vendor pages.
Apollo vs DripifyApollo vs Dripify
The same $79 a seat buys a B2B database or a LinkedIn account. Here is what each one actually includes.
HeyReach vs DripifyHeyReach vs Dripify
One prices the LinkedIn account, the other prices the rep. At eleven accounts that difference flips the bill.
Skip the copywriting, keep the deliverability
AutoMail personalizes every email, rotates and warms your inboxes, follows up, pauses on reply and books meetings into your calendar and CRM. Flat monthly fee, not per-seat, permission-based by design.
Flat pricing from $49/mo, no per-seat fees · 1-click unsubscribe in every email · CAN-SPAM and GDPR