Apollo vs Snov.io: pricing, credits and which is better
The short answer
Apollo and Snov.io both find B2B contacts and email them, but they bill on opposite axes. Apollo charges per seat ($49, $79 or $119 per user per month on annual billing) plus consumption credits, so the bill grows with headcount. Snov.io gives every plan unlimited team seats and unlimited sending accounts from $29.25 per month, so its bill grows with volume instead. Pick Apollo for the larger database and a built-in dialer, Snov.io for a whole team on one cheap subscription. AutoMail is the third option when finding contacts is not the bottleneck and writing the sequence is.
AutoMail researches and writes a 1:1 sequence. Sample data, nothing is sent.
Live, interactive · personalized · no card needed
Permission-based B2B outreach · 1-click unsubscribe in every send · deliverability protected
Quick verdict
Who each tool is for
Both Apollo and Snov.io are capable. Here is the shortest honest way to choose, with where AutoMail fits.
Pick Apollo
You need the biggest B2B database you can self-serve, want a power dialer in the same tool, and the team is small enough that per-seat pricing does not hurt. Best when contact data is the bottleneck.
Pick Snov.io
You want the whole team on one subscription with unlimited seats and unlimited sending accounts from $29.25 a month. Best when several people need access and you send more than you research.
Pick AutoMail
You already have a verified list and the real bottleneck is writing a personalized sequence for every prospect and getting replies onto the calendar. Flat per workspace, unlimited seats, no credits.
Apollo and Snov.io get shortlisted together because on paper they do the same three jobs: find business contacts, verify the addresses, then run email sequences to them. Both sell credits. Both have a Chrome extension, a CRM of sorts and an AI writing assistant. Read the feature grids side by side and they look close to interchangeable.
They are not, and the reason has almost nothing to do with features. Apollo is priced per seat with credits on top; Snov.io is priced per plan with unlimited seats. That single structural difference moves the real cost of the two tools by a factor of eight for a five-person team, in Snov.io's favor, before you compare a single data field. Going the other way, Apollo's database is far larger and it is the only one of the two with a real dialer. The tables below use figures pulled from each vendor's own pricing page in August 2026.
Side by side
Apollo vs Snov.io vs AutoMail
Pricing verified July 2026. Capabilities change, so check each vendor for the latest before you buy.
| What matters | Apollo | Snov.io | AutoMail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Teams that prospect, email and call from one platform | Running all of outbound end to end on one cheap subscription | Teams with a list who need the copy written and replies booked |
| Entry price (annual) | $49/seat/mo Basic; a free plan exists with 900 credits per seat per year | $29.25/mo Starter ($39 monthly); free Trial with 50 credits | $49/mo flat per workspace, unlimited seats |
| Pricing model | Per seat plus consumption credits; Organization has a 3-seat minimum | Per plan, unlimited seats; two meters, credits and recipients | Flat per workspace, no per-seat and no credits |
| Higher tiers | Professional $79/seat/mo, Organization $119/seat/mo (min 3 seats), annual | Pro S $74.25, Pro M $141.75, Pro L $276.75, Ultra $553.50/mo annual | $99 Growth, $249 Agency, flat per workspace |
| Cost for a 5-person team | $245/mo on Basic, $595/mo on Professional | $29.25/mo on Starter, seats are free on every plan | $49/mo on Starter, seats are free on every plan |
| What a credit buys | Data and enrichment; 30,000 to 72,000 credits per seat per year by tier | Finding and verifying contacts only; sending a campaign costs no credits | Nothing is metered by credits |
| Lead database | Very large, 210M-plus B2B contacts, its core strength | Smaller database, strongest as a finder and 7-tier verifier | None, bring or sync your own verified list |
| Team seats | Billed per seat, every user adds to the bill | Unlimited team seats on every plan | Unlimited seats on every plan |
| Connected sending accounts | Sends from connected mailboxes; deliverability is a secondary focus | Unlimited senders on every plan | 5 on Starter, unlimited on Agency, with rotation |
| Monthly email volume | Bounded by mailbox limits and plan sending rules | Unlimited emails; you pay per recipient contacted (5,000 on Starter) | Bounded by safe per-mailbox limits, not by an artificial quota |
| Mailbox warm-up | Available, less central to the product | Included; 3 warm-ups on Starter, unlimited volume | Included, plus a spam-score check before every send |
| Dialer and calls | Built-in power dialer, part of the platform | No dialer; phone numbers cost tokens at $0.02 each | Email only |
| LinkedIn steps | LinkedIn tasks inside sequences, no third-party automation | Yes, but each automation slot is a $69/mo add-on ($62 annual) | No, email only by design |
| AI copywriting | Assists and generates variants; you author the sequence | AI email writer that drafts and rewrites; you author the sequence | Researches each prospect and writes a full 1:1 sequence |
| Reply handling | Unified inbox inside the sales platform with CRM sync | Shared inbox plus a light built-in sales CRM with deals and tasks | Pauses the sequence, classifies intent, routes to booking |
| Free plan | Yes, free plan with limited credits | A free Trial with 50 credits, not a permanent free plan | No free plan |
Comparison reflects publicly available pricing and positioning as of July 2026. Company and product names are trademarks of their respective owners.
The third option
Where AutoMail fits between them
The AI writes the sequence
Both tools above leave the copy to you. AutoMail researches each prospect and writes a genuine 1:1 opener and follow-ups, so relevance, not just volume, drives the reply rate.
Deliverability built in
Inbox rotation, gradual warm-up and a spam-score check on every send keep personalized copy in the primary inbox, built for the 2026 Gmail and Yahoo sender rules.
Replies become meetings
When a prospect answers, the sequence pauses, intent is classified, and meeting-ready replies route to your booking link and CRM. Flat per workspace, unlimited seats, no credits.
One honest caveat: AutoMail has no built-in lead database, so bring or sync your own verified list. If prospecting data is what you need most, keep a data tool for that and run the outreach here.
Good questions
Apollo vs Snov.io, answered
Keep comparing
More head-to-head comparisons
Instantly vs Smartlead
The two most popular cold email platforms, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs InstantlyLemlist vs Instantly
Multichannel personalization versus high-volume email, compared, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs SmartleadLemlist vs Smartlead
Multichannel personalization versus scale and white-label, compared, plus a third option.
Saleshandy vs SmartleadSaleshandy vs Smartlead
Two flat-priced senders with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.
QuickMail vs InstantlyQuickMail vs Instantly
Unlimited seats and senders versus bundled lead data, compared, plus a third option.
Woodpecker vs SmartleadWoodpecker vs Smartlead
Pay-per-prospect versus flat unlimited sending, compared, plus a third option.
Reply.io vs LemlistReply.io vs Lemlist
Two multichannel outreach platforms with built-in lead data, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Klenty vs SalesloftKlenty vs Salesloft
An affordable sales engagement tool versus an enterprise revenue platform, compared, plus a third option.
Instantly vs SaleshandyInstantly vs Saleshandy
Two high-volume cold email platforms with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Klenty vs QuickMailKlenty vs QuickMail
A per-user sales engagement tool with a database versus a flat-priced sender with unlimited seats, compared, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs MailshakeLemlist vs Mailshake
Two multichannel sales engagement tools with built-in lead data, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Woodpecker vs QuickMailWoodpecker vs QuickMail
Two deliverability-first cold email tools with very different pricing models, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Saleshandy vs QuickMailSaleshandy vs QuickMail
Two flat-priced cold email tools with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Mailshake vs SaleshandyMailshake vs Saleshandy
Per-seat sales engagement versus flat unlimited-inbox sending, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Apollo vs InstantlyApollo vs Instantly
A B2B database with sequencing versus a deliverability-first sender, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Smartlead vs ApolloSmartlead vs Apollo
A deliverability-first sender versus a B2B contact database with sequencing, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Snov.io vs Hunter.ioSnov.io vs Hunter.io
Two find-verify-and-send suites compared on credits, seats and sending caps, plus a third option.
Woodpecker vs DripifyWoodpecker vs Dripify
An email sender that added LinkedIn versus a LinkedIn tool that added email, plus a third option.
Skip the copywriting, keep the deliverability
AutoMail personalizes every email, rotates and warms your inboxes, follows up, pauses on reply and books meetings into your calendar and CRM. Flat monthly fee, not per-seat, permission-based by design.
Flat pricing from $49/mo, no per-seat fees · 1-click unsubscribe in every email · CAN-SPAM and GDPR