Snov.io vs Hunter.io Pricing, email finder and which is better

The short answer

Snov.io and Hunter.io are both find-verify-and-send suites sold by credits, not sending platforms. Snov.io is the broader and cheaper one: it starts at $29.25 per month on annual billing with unlimited team seats, unlimited sending accounts and unlimited monthly email volume, and it adds LinkedIn automation and a built-in CRM. Hunter.io is the more accurate finder and the only one with a genuinely free tier, but it caps connected email accounts by plan (1, 3, 10 then 20), so scaling means buying account slots. Pick Snov.io to run outbound end to end on one bill, Hunter.io when data quality matters more than volume. AutoMail is the third option when finding contacts is not your bottleneck and writing the personalized sequence is.

jump to the full comparison ↓

Sequence Studio

Prospect Pick one, then draft

AutoMail researches and writes the 1:1 sequence right here. It runs in your browser, so no email goes out.

Type a real prospect and AutoMail writes the sequence here, from what you enter. On your list the AI does the research for you.

AI worklog research · write · check

Tone

Deliverability Inbox-safe

Inbox rotation Warm-up ✓ 1-click unsubscribe ✓ Sender verified ✓

Reply detected · sequence paused Meeting booked ✦ Synced to CRM

Live, interactive · personalized · no card needed

Sequence drafted · inbox-safe Reply detected · meeting booked

Permission-based B2B outreach · 1-click unsubscribe in every send · deliverability protected

Flat pricing from $49/mo, no per-seat fees Warm-up and inbox rotation on every plan One-click unsubscribe and suppression built in

Quick verdict

Who each tool is for

Both Snov.io and Hunter.io are capable. Here is the shortest honest way to choose, with where AutoMail fits.

Pick Snov.io

You want finding, verification, sending, LinkedIn steps and a light CRM on one USD bill, with unlimited team seats and no cap on connected sending accounts. The better value if outbound is the whole job.

Pick Hunter.io

Contact accuracy is the priority and volume is modest. It has the strongest reputation for finder and verifier quality, a real free tier to test with, and it is the cleaner choice if you mainly need data through the API.

Pick AutoMail

You already have a list and the bottleneck is writing personalized sequences that land and get replies. The AI researches each prospect, writes the 1:1 sequence, rotates and warms inboxes, then routes meeting-ready replies to your booking link.

Snov.io and Hunter.io get shortlisted together because they sell the same shape of product: a B2B contact database, an email finder, a verifier, and a sequence sender bundled into one credit-based subscription. Buyers usually reach them after realizing that a pure sending tool leaves them with no list, and a pure data provider leaves them with no way to send.

The honest framing is that neither is primarily a sending platform, and that matters more than any feature row. Both meter the thing you do most: Snov.io charges credits for lookups and verifications plus a separate recipient allowance, and Hunter.io charges credits and caps how many mailboxes you may connect at all. If your plan is to send serious volume across many rotating inboxes, you will hit those ceilings before you hit a feature limit. The table below is honest about where each one genuinely wins, including where they beat us.

Side by side

Snov.io vs Hunter.io vs AutoMail

Pricing verified August 2026. Capabilities change, so check each vendor for the latest before you buy.

What matters	Snov.io	Hunter.io	AutoMail
Best for	Running all of outbound on one subscription	Accurate contact data at modest send volume	Teams with a list who need the copy written and replies booked
Entry price	$29.25/mo Starter on annual billing, $39/mo monthly	Free tier at $0, then Starter $49/mo, or $34/mo ($408) billed yearly	$49/mo flat per workspace, unlimited seats
Billing currency	US dollars	US dollars by default; EUR or GBP only if your billing address is there, same figures	US dollars
Pricing model	Credits for lookups and verification, plus a separate recipient allowance	Credits for search and verification, plus a cap on connected mailboxes	Flat per workspace, no credits and no per-seat
Entry-tier credits	1,000 credits and 5,000 recipients on Starter	2,000 credits/mo on Starter; 50/mo on the free plan	No credit system; bring your own verified list
Connected sending accounts	Unlimited senders on every plan	Capped by tier: 1 free, 3 Starter, 10 Growth, 20 Scale, more as a paid add-on	5 on Starter, unlimited on Agency, with rotation
Monthly email volume	Unlimited monthly emails; you pay per recipient contacted	Bounded by connected accounts and plan recipients	Bounded by safe per-mailbox limits, not by an artificial quota
Team seats	Unlimited team seats on every plan	Unlimited team members on every plan	Unlimited seats on every plan
Email verification	7-tier verification included, spends credits	Auto-verification on paid plans; the verifier is its best-known product	Bounce safeguards on send; bring a verified list
Mailbox warm-up	Included, 3 warm-ups on Starter, unlimited warm-up volume	Not core; sold as Inbox Protection and managed accounts add-ons	Included, plus a spam-score check before every send
LinkedIn steps	Yes, but LinkedIn slots cost $69/mo each on top of the plan	No	No, email only by design
Built-in CRM	Yes, a light sales CRM with deals and tasks	No, integrates with your CRM	No, syncs to your CRM
AI copywriting	AI email writer that drafts and rewrites	AI Writing Assistant on paid plans	Researches each prospect and writes the full 1:1 sequence
Free plan	No free plan	Yes, 50 credits a month and 1 connected account	No free plan

Comparison reflects publicly available pricing and positioning as of August 2026. Company and product names are trademarks of their respective owners.

The third option

Where AutoMail fits between them

The AI writes the sequence

Both tools above leave the copy to you. AutoMail researches each prospect and writes a genuine 1:1 opener and follow-ups, so relevance, not just volume, drives the reply rate.

Deliverability built in

Inbox rotation, gradual warm-up and a spam-score check on every send keep personalized copy in the primary inbox, built for the 2026 Google and Microsoft sender rules.

Replies become meetings

When a prospect answers, the sequence pauses, intent is classified, and meeting-ready replies route to your booking link and CRM. Flat per workspace, unlimited seats, no credits.

One honest caveat: AutoMail has no built-in lead database, so bring or sync your own verified list. If prospecting data is what you need most, keep a data tool for that and run the outreach here.

Good questions

Snov.io vs Hunter.io, answered

Snov.io is the broader suite: finder, verifier, sender, LinkedIn automation and a light CRM, with unlimited team seats and unlimited connected sending accounts. Hunter.io is narrower and data-first: its email finder and verifier are its reputation, and its sequence tool is deliberately modest, capping connected mailboxes at 1, 3, 10 or 20 depending on plan. Snov.io suits running outbound end to end; Hunter.io suits sourcing accurate contacts.

Snov.io, once you are actually sending. Its Starter is $29.25 a month on annual billing with unlimited seats and unlimited sending accounts, while Hunter.io Starter is $49 a month ($408 billed yearly) and allows only three connected mailboxes. Hunter.io wins at zero volume because it has a real free tier with 50 credits a month, which Snov.io does not offer.

Hunter.io has the stronger reputation for finder and verifier accuracy, and it is the one most teams trust for API-based enrichment at scale. Snov.io finds more contacts per credit in many searches but tends to return more addresses that need verifying. Neither is accurate enough to skip verification, and both charge credits for it, so budget for that step either way.

Yes, both include sequence sending, but with different ceilings. Snov.io allows unlimited senders and unlimited monthly emails and charges per recipient contacted. Hunter.io Sequences is capped by how many email accounts your plan lets you connect, so scaling means buying account slots. If you plan to rotate across many mailboxes, check that cap before you commit.

A US buyer is billed in US dollars. Hunter is a French company and its pricing page shows euros to visitors browsing from Europe, which is where the confusion comes from, but the currency follows your billing address and USD is the default. The figures are the same number in each currency rather than converted, so Starter is $49 for a US team and 49 euros for a French one. No exchange rate, no foreign transaction fee.

Both include an AI assistant that drafts or rewrites a message, but you still design and write every sequence. That is the gap AutoMail fills: it researches each prospect, writes the full personalized opener and follow-ups, warms and rotates the sending inboxes, then pauses on reply and routes meeting-ready answers to your booking link.

Keep comparing

More head-to-head comparisons

Instantly vs Smartlead

The two most popular cold email platforms, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Instantly

Multichannel personalization versus high-volume email, compared, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Smartlead

Multichannel personalization versus scale and white-label, compared, plus a third option.

Saleshandy vs Smartlead

Two flat-priced senders with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.

QuickMail vs Instantly

Unlimited seats and senders versus bundled lead data, compared, plus a third option.

Woodpecker vs Smartlead

Pay-per-prospect versus flat unlimited sending, compared, plus a third option.

Reply.io vs Lemlist

Two multichannel platforms that both now sell unlimited-user email plans, priced from both vendors in October 2026.

Klenty vs Salesloft

An affordable sales engagement tool versus an enterprise revenue platform, compared, plus a third option.

Instantly vs Saleshandy

Two high-volume cold email platforms with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Klenty vs QuickMail

A per-user sales engagement tool with a database versus a flat-priced sender with unlimited seats, compared, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Mailshake

Two multichannel sales engagement tools with built-in lead data, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Woodpecker vs QuickMail

Two deliverability-first cold email tools with very different pricing models, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Saleshandy vs QuickMail

Two flat-priced cold email tools with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Mailshake vs Saleshandy

Per-seat sales engagement versus flat unlimited-inbox sending, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Apollo vs Instantly

A B2B database with sequencing versus a deliverability-first sender, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Smartlead vs Apollo

A deliverability-first sender versus a B2B contact database with sequencing, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Woodpecker vs Dripify

An email sender that added LinkedIn versus a LinkedIn tool that added email, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Dripify

Unlimited-user email against per-seat LinkedIn automation, with the cap LinkedIn actually enforces.

Apollo vs Snov.io

A per-seat sales database versus an unlimited-seat find-and-send suite, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Apollo

Flat unlimited-user email against a per-seat sales platform, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Apollo vs Hunter.io

A 210M-contact database billed per seat against a precision finder billed per plan, plus a third option.

Saleshandy vs Apollo

A workspace-priced sender with its own 852M-contact database against a per-seat sales platform, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Clay

A flat unlimited-user sequencer against a credit-metered data engine, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Saleshandy vs Lemlist

Two multichannel tools that meter opposite things, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Instantly vs Dripify

Email volume you can buy more of against LinkedIn reach that money cannot raise.

Saleshandy vs Dripify

Email volume you can buy more of against LinkedIn reach that money cannot raise.

Yesware vs Dripify

Two cheap seats, two hidden ceilings: 20 recipients a month against 100 LinkedIn invites a week.

Klenty vs Dripify

A per-seat sales engagement platform against a per-seat LinkedIn robot, priced from both vendors on the same day.

Smartlead vs Dripify

A high-volume email sender against a per-seat LinkedIn robot, priced from both vendor pages on the same day.

Snov.io vs Dripify

An email-first suite that sells LinkedIn as a per-slot add-on against a LinkedIn tool that bundles a little email, priced from both vendor pages.

Apollo vs Dripify

The same $79 a seat buys a B2B database or a LinkedIn account. Here is what each one actually includes.

HeyReach vs Dripify

One prices the LinkedIn account, the other prices the rep. At eleven accounts that difference flips the bill.

Expandi vs Dripify

Same $79 annual price at the top of Dripify and the bottom of Expandi. The weekly invitation ceiling is what differs.

Waalaxy vs Dripify

Waalaxy is the cheaper LinkedIn seat, but email sequences sit on its top plan. Dripify puts email on every plan.

Dux-Soup vs Dripify

Dux-Soup repriced to $41.25 a seat and still has no email step. Dripify includes email on every plan from $39.

Linked Helper vs Dripify

Linked Helper costs $8.25 a LinkedIn account on annual billing and runs on your own computer. Dripify costs $39 and runs in the cloud with email included.

PhantomBuster vs Dripify

PhantomBuster sells hours of automation for the whole workspace. Dripify sells a seat per LinkedIn account with email steps included.

Meet Alfred vs Dripify

Meet Alfred wins on annual price and channels. Dripify wins on monthly price and puts email on its cheapest plan.

HeyReach vs Lemlist

One is LinkedIn at agency scale with no email. The other is email first with LinkedIn bolted on per user.

Expandi vs HeyReach

Same $79 for one LinkedIn account. From ten accounts up, one prices every seat and the other sells blocks of 25.

Waalaxy vs Expandi

Waalaxy is the cheaper LinkedIn seat with email on its top plan. Expandi costs more per account and builds deeper sequences.

Waalaxy vs HeyReach

Waalaxy is the cheap per-user seat with email on its top plan. HeyReach prices per sender and gets cheap only when you run a lot of LinkedIn accounts.

Waalaxy vs Lemlist

Waalaxy is a LinkedIn tool that adds email on its top plan. Lemlist is an email tool that adds LinkedIn on its top plan. The price gap depends on which channel you need first.

Expandi vs Lemlist

Expandi is LinkedIn first with email follow-ups. Lemlist is email first with LinkedIn on its top plan. One seat of each costs within $10 of the other.

HeyReach vs PhantomBuster

HeyReach charges per LinkedIn sender and runs the outreach. PhantomBuster charges per workspace for runtime and builds the list.

Waalaxy vs Linked Helper

Waalaxy runs LinkedIn from its cloud and adds email on its top plan. Linked Helper runs on your own computer, costs less per account and never sends email.

Reply.io vs Instantly

Reply.io sells a multichannel sales engagement platform priced by contacts and seats. Instantly sells cold email volume with unlimited mailboxes, priced by emails sent.

Reply.io vs Smartlead

Reply.io sells a multichannel sales engagement platform priced by contacts and seats. Smartlead sells cold email volume with unlimited mailboxes, priced by sends and contacts.

See how AutoMail compares to each tool

Skip the copywriting, keep the deliverability

AutoMail personalizes every email, rotates and warms your inboxes, follows up, pauses on reply and books meetings into your calendar and CRM. Flat monthly fee, not per-seat, permission-based by design.

See pricing

Flat pricing from $49/mo, no per-seat fees · 1-click unsubscribe in every email · CAN-SPAM and GDPR