Reply.io vs Apollo pricing and which is better for outbound
The short answer
Apollo is the better buy when your team needs the contact data, and Reply.io is the better buy when your team already has a list and wants to run email, LinkedIn and calls from one sequence. Apollo Basic costs $49 per seat a month billed annually, but it sends from 1 mailbox per user and caps sending at 250 emails a day, so unlimited mailboxes and unlimited daily sends start on Professional at $79 per seat. Reply.io Email Volume starts at $59 a month for 1,000 active contacts with unlimited users, and Multichannel is $99 per user with five mailboxes, one LinkedIn account and calling included.
AutoMail researches and writes the 1:1 sequence right here. It runs in your browser, so no email goes out.
Type a real prospect and AutoMail writes the sequence here, from what you enter. On your list the AI does the research for you.
Live, interactive · personalized · no card needed
Permission-based B2B outreach · 1-click unsubscribe in every send · deliverability protected
Quick verdict
Who each tool is for
Both Reply.io and Apollo are capable. Here is the shortest honest way to choose, with where AutoMail fits.
Pick Apollo
You need the contact data. Apollo bundles a B2B database, enrichment, sequences, a US dialer and a meeting scheduler, priced per seat with a credit pool. Budget $79 a seat for Professional if each rep sends from more than one mailbox or more than 250 emails a day.
Pick Reply.io
You already have a list and reps work email, LinkedIn and the phone in the same sequence. Multichannel at $99 per user includes five mailboxes, one LinkedIn account and calling, and Email Volume gives unlimited users from $59 a month.
Pick AutoMail
The email itself is the problem. The AI researches each company, writes the opener and every follow-up for that prospect, sends from warmed and rotated inboxes, pauses on reply and routes interested prospects to your booking link. Flat per workspace from $24 a month annual, unlimited seats.
Reply.io and Apollo end up on the same shortlist because both run outbound sequences, but they were built from opposite ends. Apollo started as a B2B contact database and added sequences, a dialer, a meeting scheduler and a CRM layer around it, so most buyers come to Apollo for the data and stay for the workflow. Reply.io started as a sequencing tool and grew into a multichannel sales engagement platform with email, LinkedIn, calls and SMS in one cadence, plus an AI SDR product called Jason.
We read both pricing pages in October 2026. Apollo lists Free at $0, Basic at $49, Professional at $79 and Organization at $119 per seat a month on annual billing, with Organization requiring at least three seats and month to month billing costing about 24 percent more. Each paid seat comes with a yearly credit pool: 30,000 on Basic, 48,000 on Professional and 72,000 on Organization, and unused credits expire at the end of the billing cycle. Reply.io lists Email Volume from $59 a month for 1,000 active contacts, Multichannel from $99 per user, Agency from $166 and the AI SDR plan from $500.
The number most comparisons miss is in Apollo's plan table, not on its plan cards. Basic allows 1 mailbox per user and 250 email sends a day. Professional and Organization lift that to unlimited Google and Microsoft mailboxes and unlimited daily sends. So a cold email team that rotates several inboxes per rep is really pricing Apollo at $79 a seat, while Reply.io Email Volume includes unlimited mailboxes under a fair use policy at its entry price.
Side by side
Reply.io vs Apollo vs AutoMail
Pricing verified October 2026. Capabilities change, so check each vendor for the latest before you buy.
| What matters | Reply.io | Apollo | AutoMail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built for | SDR teams running email, LinkedIn, calls and SMS from one sequence | Teams that prospect from a built-in B2B database and sell from one platform | Writing and sending the 1:1 email sequence that books the meeting |
| Pricing model | Email plan by active contacts; Multichannel per user | Per seat plus a yearly credit pool per seat | Flat per workspace, unlimited seats, no credits |
| Entry paid plan | Email Volume from $59 a month for 1,000 active contacts | Basic $49 per seat a month, billed annually, 30,000 credits a year | Starter $49 a month, $24 annual |
| Mid tier | Multichannel from $99 per user a month | Professional $79 per seat a month, billed annually, 48,000 credits a year | Growth $99 a month, $49 annual, 25 inboxes |
| Top published plan | AI SDR from $500 a month; Agency from $166 | Organization $119 per seat a month, minimum 3 seats, 72,000 credits a year | Agency $249 a month, $124 annual; Enterprise $498 |
| Free plan | No free plan; free trial from the pricing page | Free plan with 900 credits a year and 2 sequences | No free plan; try the Sequence Studio once on the homepage |
| Mailboxes per user | Unlimited on Email Volume under fair use; 5 per user on Multichannel, then $29 a month each | 1 on Free and Basic; unlimited Google and Microsoft plus 5 SMTP on Professional, plus 15 SMTP on Organization | 5 inboxes on Starter up to unlimited, with rotation |
| Daily send limit | Set per mailbox by you, with throttling | 250 emails a day on Free and Basic; unlimited on Professional and Organization | Paced per inbox to protect reputation |
| Contact data | Built-in B2B contact database, searched with data credits | Core product: B2B contact and account data, enrichment, intent topics | None, bring or sync your own verified list |
| Credits expire | Email plan is priced by active contacts rather than credits | Yes, unused credits expire at the end of each billing cycle | No credits |
| Buying domains and inboxes | Domain from $6 a year plus $5 per mailbox a month; pre-warmed from $25 a year plus $15 per mailbox | Domain and mailbox purchasing from Basic, paid in credits | Bring your own, connected in minutes |
| Warm-up | Warm-up through its Mailtoaster.ai service | Deliverability suite and warm-up from Basic | Warm-up included, plus a spam check before each send |
| LinkedIn steps | $69 a month per account on Email Volume; one per user included on Multichannel | LinkedIn tasks and a Chrome extension, no automated LinkedIn sending account | None, email only |
| Calls | $29 per user a month, included per user on Multichannel | US dialer from Basic, credits apply; Advanced Dialer add-on $119 a team a month | None |
| AI | Jason AI SDR from $500 a month | AI research and AI writing allowance (5,000 words on Free up to 1,000,000 on Organization) | Researches each prospect and writes the whole sequence, included |
| Automated workflows | Sequence triggers and CRM integrations | 5 per team on Basic, 50 on Professional, 500 on Organization | Reply detection and booking routing built in |
Comparison reflects publicly available pricing and positioning as of October 2026. Company and product names are trademarks of their respective owners.
The third option
Where AutoMail fits between them
The AI writes the sequence
Both tools above leave the copy to you. AutoMail researches each prospect and writes a genuine 1:1 opener and follow-ups, so relevance, not just volume, drives the reply rate.
Deliverability built in
Inbox rotation, gradual warm-up and a spam-score check on every send keep personalized copy in the primary inbox, built for the 2026 Google and Microsoft sender rules.
Replies become meetings
When a prospect answers, the sequence pauses, intent is classified, and meeting-ready replies route to your booking link and CRM. Flat per workspace, unlimited seats, no credits.
One honest caveat: AutoMail has no built-in lead database, so bring or sync your own verified list. If prospecting data is what you need most, keep a data tool for that and run the outreach here.
Good questions
Reply.io vs Apollo, answered
Keep comparing
More head-to-head comparisons
Instantly vs Smartlead
The two most popular cold email platforms, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs InstantlyLemlist vs Instantly
Multichannel personalization versus high-volume email, compared, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs SmartleadLemlist vs Smartlead
Multichannel personalization versus scale and white-label, compared, plus a third option.
Saleshandy vs SmartleadSaleshandy vs Smartlead
Two flat-priced senders with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.
QuickMail vs InstantlyQuickMail vs Instantly
Unlimited seats and senders versus bundled lead data, compared, plus a third option.
Woodpecker vs SmartleadWoodpecker vs Smartlead
Pay-per-prospect versus flat unlimited sending, compared, plus a third option.
Reply.io vs LemlistReply.io vs Lemlist
Two multichannel platforms that both now sell unlimited-user email plans, priced from both vendors in October 2026.
Klenty vs SalesloftKlenty vs Salesloft
An affordable sales engagement tool versus an enterprise revenue platform, compared, plus a third option.
Instantly vs SaleshandyInstantly vs Saleshandy
Two high-volume cold email platforms with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Klenty vs QuickMailKlenty vs QuickMail
A per-user sales engagement tool with a database versus a flat-priced sender with unlimited seats, compared, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs MailshakeLemlist vs Mailshake
Two multichannel sales engagement tools with built-in lead data, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Woodpecker vs QuickMailWoodpecker vs QuickMail
Two deliverability-first cold email tools with very different pricing models, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Saleshandy vs QuickMailSaleshandy vs QuickMail
Two flat-priced cold email tools with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Mailshake vs SaleshandyMailshake vs Saleshandy
Per-seat sales engagement versus flat unlimited-inbox sending, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Apollo vs InstantlyApollo vs Instantly
A B2B database with sequencing versus a deliverability-first sender, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Smartlead vs ApolloSmartlead vs Apollo
A deliverability-first sender versus a B2B contact database with sequencing, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Snov.io vs Hunter.ioSnov.io vs Hunter.io
Two find-verify-and-send suites compared on credits, seats and sending caps, plus a third option.
Woodpecker vs DripifyWoodpecker vs Dripify
An email sender that added LinkedIn versus a LinkedIn tool that added email, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs DripifyLemlist vs Dripify
Unlimited-user email against per-seat LinkedIn automation, with the cap LinkedIn actually enforces.
Apollo vs Snov.ioApollo vs Snov.io
A per-seat sales database versus an unlimited-seat find-and-send suite, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs ApolloLemlist vs Apollo
Flat unlimited-user email against a per-seat sales platform, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Apollo vs Hunter.ioApollo vs Hunter.io
A 210M-contact database billed per seat against a precision finder billed per plan, plus a third option.
Saleshandy vs ApolloSaleshandy vs Apollo
A workspace-priced sender with its own 852M-contact database against a per-seat sales platform, plus a third option.
Lemlist vs ClayLemlist vs Clay
A flat unlimited-user sequencer against a credit-metered data engine, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Saleshandy vs LemlistSaleshandy vs Lemlist
Two multichannel tools that meter opposite things, compared honestly, plus a third option.
Instantly vs DripifyInstantly vs Dripify
Email volume you can buy more of against LinkedIn reach that money cannot raise.
Saleshandy vs DripifySaleshandy vs Dripify
Email volume you can buy more of against LinkedIn reach that money cannot raise.
Yesware vs DripifyYesware vs Dripify
Two cheap seats, two hidden ceilings: 20 recipients a month against 100 LinkedIn invites a week.
Klenty vs DripifyKlenty vs Dripify
A per-seat sales engagement platform against a per-seat LinkedIn robot, priced from both vendors on the same day.
Smartlead vs DripifySmartlead vs Dripify
A high-volume email sender against a per-seat LinkedIn robot, priced from both vendor pages on the same day.
Snov.io vs DripifySnov.io vs Dripify
An email-first suite that sells LinkedIn as a per-slot add-on against a LinkedIn tool that bundles a little email, priced from both vendor pages.
Apollo vs DripifyApollo vs Dripify
The same $79 a seat buys a B2B database or a LinkedIn account. Here is what each one actually includes.
HeyReach vs DripifyHeyReach vs Dripify
One prices the LinkedIn account, the other prices the rep. At eleven accounts that difference flips the bill.
Expandi vs DripifyExpandi vs Dripify
Same $79 annual price at the top of Dripify and the bottom of Expandi. The weekly invitation ceiling is what differs.
Waalaxy vs DripifyWaalaxy vs Dripify
Waalaxy is the cheaper LinkedIn seat, but email sequences sit on its top plan. Dripify puts email on every plan.
Dux-Soup vs DripifyDux-Soup vs Dripify
Dux-Soup repriced to $41.25 a seat and still has no email step. Dripify includes email on every plan from $39.
Linked Helper vs DripifyLinked Helper vs Dripify
Linked Helper costs $8.25 a LinkedIn account on annual billing and runs on your own computer. Dripify costs $39 and runs in the cloud with email included.
PhantomBuster vs DripifyPhantomBuster vs Dripify
PhantomBuster sells hours of automation for the whole workspace. Dripify sells a seat per LinkedIn account with email steps included.
Meet Alfred vs DripifyMeet Alfred vs Dripify
Meet Alfred wins on annual price and channels. Dripify wins on monthly price and puts email on its cheapest plan.
HeyReach vs LemlistHeyReach vs Lemlist
One is LinkedIn at agency scale with no email. The other is email first with LinkedIn bolted on per user.
Expandi vs HeyReachExpandi vs HeyReach
Same $79 for one LinkedIn account. From ten accounts up, one prices every seat and the other sells blocks of 25.
Waalaxy vs ExpandiWaalaxy vs Expandi
Waalaxy is the cheaper LinkedIn seat with email on its top plan. Expandi costs more per account and builds deeper sequences.
Waalaxy vs HeyReachWaalaxy vs HeyReach
Waalaxy is the cheap per-user seat with email on its top plan. HeyReach prices per sender and gets cheap only when you run a lot of LinkedIn accounts.
Waalaxy vs LemlistWaalaxy vs Lemlist
Waalaxy is a LinkedIn tool that adds email on its top plan. Lemlist is an email tool that adds LinkedIn on its top plan. The price gap depends on which channel you need first.
Expandi vs LemlistExpandi vs Lemlist
Expandi is LinkedIn first with email follow-ups. Lemlist is email first with LinkedIn on its top plan. One seat of each costs within $10 of the other.
HeyReach vs PhantomBusterHeyReach vs PhantomBuster
HeyReach charges per LinkedIn sender and runs the outreach. PhantomBuster charges per workspace for runtime and builds the list.
Waalaxy vs Linked HelperWaalaxy vs Linked Helper
Waalaxy runs LinkedIn from its cloud and adds email on its top plan. Linked Helper runs on your own computer, costs less per account and never sends email.
Reply.io vs InstantlyReply.io vs Instantly
Reply.io sells a multichannel sales engagement platform priced by contacts and seats. Instantly sells cold email volume with unlimited mailboxes, priced by emails sent.
Reply.io vs SmartleadReply.io vs Smartlead
Reply.io sells a multichannel sales engagement platform priced by contacts and seats. Smartlead sells cold email volume with unlimited mailboxes, priced by sends and contacts.
Skip the copywriting, keep the deliverability
AutoMail personalizes every email, rotates and warms your inboxes, follows up, pauses on reply and books meetings into your calendar and CRM. Flat monthly fee, not per-seat, permission-based by design.
Flat pricing from $49/mo, no per-seat fees · 1-click unsubscribe in every email · CAN-SPAM and GDPR