AutoMail

Reply.io vs Apollo pricing and which is better for outbound

The short answer

Apollo is the better buy when your team needs the contact data, and Reply.io is the better buy when your team already has a list and wants to run email, LinkedIn and calls from one sequence. Apollo Basic costs $49 per seat a month billed annually, but it sends from 1 mailbox per user and caps sending at 250 emails a day, so unlimited mailboxes and unlimited daily sends start on Professional at $79 per seat. Reply.io Email Volume starts at $59 a month for 1,000 active contacts with unlimited users, and Multichannel is $99 per user with five mailboxes, one LinkedIn account and calling included.

Sequence Studio
Prospect Pick one, then draft

AutoMail researches and writes the 1:1 sequence right here. It runs in your browser, so no email goes out.

Type a real prospect and AutoMail writes the sequence here, from what you enter. On your list the AI does the research for you.

AI worklog research · write · check
Tone
Deliverability Inbox-safe
Inbox rotation Warm-up ✓ 1-click unsubscribe ✓ Sender verified ✓
Reply

Reply detected · sequence paused Synced to CRM

Live, interactive · personalized · no card needed

Sequence drafted · inbox-safe Reply detected · meeting booked

Permission-based B2B outreach · 1-click unsubscribe in every send · deliverability protected

Flat pricing from $49/mo, no per-seat fees Warm-up and inbox rotation on every plan One-click unsubscribe and suppression built in

Quick verdict

Who each tool is for

Both Reply.io and Apollo are capable. Here is the shortest honest way to choose, with where AutoMail fits.

Pick Apollo

You need the contact data. Apollo bundles a B2B database, enrichment, sequences, a US dialer and a meeting scheduler, priced per seat with a credit pool. Budget $79 a seat for Professional if each rep sends from more than one mailbox or more than 250 emails a day.

Pick Reply.io

You already have a list and reps work email, LinkedIn and the phone in the same sequence. Multichannel at $99 per user includes five mailboxes, one LinkedIn account and calling, and Email Volume gives unlimited users from $59 a month.

Pick AutoMail

The email itself is the problem. The AI researches each company, writes the opener and every follow-up for that prospect, sends from warmed and rotated inboxes, pauses on reply and routes interested prospects to your booking link. Flat per workspace from $24 a month annual, unlimited seats.

Reply.io and Apollo end up on the same shortlist because both run outbound sequences, but they were built from opposite ends. Apollo started as a B2B contact database and added sequences, a dialer, a meeting scheduler and a CRM layer around it, so most buyers come to Apollo for the data and stay for the workflow. Reply.io started as a sequencing tool and grew into a multichannel sales engagement platform with email, LinkedIn, calls and SMS in one cadence, plus an AI SDR product called Jason.

We read both pricing pages in October 2026. Apollo lists Free at $0, Basic at $49, Professional at $79 and Organization at $119 per seat a month on annual billing, with Organization requiring at least three seats and month to month billing costing about 24 percent more. Each paid seat comes with a yearly credit pool: 30,000 on Basic, 48,000 on Professional and 72,000 on Organization, and unused credits expire at the end of the billing cycle. Reply.io lists Email Volume from $59 a month for 1,000 active contacts, Multichannel from $99 per user, Agency from $166 and the AI SDR plan from $500.

The number most comparisons miss is in Apollo's plan table, not on its plan cards. Basic allows 1 mailbox per user and 250 email sends a day. Professional and Organization lift that to unlimited Google and Microsoft mailboxes and unlimited daily sends. So a cold email team that rotates several inboxes per rep is really pricing Apollo at $79 a seat, while Reply.io Email Volume includes unlimited mailboxes under a fair use policy at its entry price.

Side by side

Reply.io vs Apollo vs AutoMail

Pricing verified October 2026. Capabilities change, so check each vendor for the latest before you buy.

What matters Reply.io Apollo AutoMail
Built for SDR teams running email, LinkedIn, calls and SMS from one sequence Teams that prospect from a built-in B2B database and sell from one platform Writing and sending the 1:1 email sequence that books the meeting
Pricing model Email plan by active contacts; Multichannel per user Per seat plus a yearly credit pool per seat Flat per workspace, unlimited seats, no credits
Entry paid plan Email Volume from $59 a month for 1,000 active contacts Basic $49 per seat a month, billed annually, 30,000 credits a year Starter $49 a month, $24 annual
Mid tier Multichannel from $99 per user a month Professional $79 per seat a month, billed annually, 48,000 credits a year Growth $99 a month, $49 annual, 25 inboxes
Top published plan AI SDR from $500 a month; Agency from $166 Organization $119 per seat a month, minimum 3 seats, 72,000 credits a year Agency $249 a month, $124 annual; Enterprise $498
Free plan No free plan; free trial from the pricing page Free plan with 900 credits a year and 2 sequences No free plan; try the Sequence Studio once on the homepage
Mailboxes per user Unlimited on Email Volume under fair use; 5 per user on Multichannel, then $29 a month each 1 on Free and Basic; unlimited Google and Microsoft plus 5 SMTP on Professional, plus 15 SMTP on Organization 5 inboxes on Starter up to unlimited, with rotation
Daily send limit Set per mailbox by you, with throttling 250 emails a day on Free and Basic; unlimited on Professional and Organization Paced per inbox to protect reputation
Contact data Built-in B2B contact database, searched with data credits Core product: B2B contact and account data, enrichment, intent topics None, bring or sync your own verified list
Credits expire Email plan is priced by active contacts rather than credits Yes, unused credits expire at the end of each billing cycle No credits
Buying domains and inboxes Domain from $6 a year plus $5 per mailbox a month; pre-warmed from $25 a year plus $15 per mailbox Domain and mailbox purchasing from Basic, paid in credits Bring your own, connected in minutes
Warm-up Warm-up through its Mailtoaster.ai service Deliverability suite and warm-up from Basic Warm-up included, plus a spam check before each send
LinkedIn steps $69 a month per account on Email Volume; one per user included on Multichannel LinkedIn tasks and a Chrome extension, no automated LinkedIn sending account None, email only
Calls $29 per user a month, included per user on Multichannel US dialer from Basic, credits apply; Advanced Dialer add-on $119 a team a month None
AI Jason AI SDR from $500 a month AI research and AI writing allowance (5,000 words on Free up to 1,000,000 on Organization) Researches each prospect and writes the whole sequence, included
Automated workflows Sequence triggers and CRM integrations 5 per team on Basic, 50 on Professional, 500 on Organization Reply detection and booking routing built in

Comparison reflects publicly available pricing and positioning as of October 2026. Company and product names are trademarks of their respective owners.

The third option

Where AutoMail fits between them

The AI writes the sequence

Both tools above leave the copy to you. AutoMail researches each prospect and writes a genuine 1:1 opener and follow-ups, so relevance, not just volume, drives the reply rate.

Deliverability built in

Inbox rotation, gradual warm-up and a spam-score check on every send keep personalized copy in the primary inbox, built for the 2026 Google and Microsoft sender rules.

Replies become meetings

When a prospect answers, the sequence pauses, intent is classified, and meeting-ready replies route to your booking link and CRM. Flat per workspace, unlimited seats, no credits.

One honest caveat: AutoMail has no built-in lead database, so bring or sync your own verified list. If prospecting data is what you need most, keep a data tool for that and run the outreach here.

Good questions

Reply.io vs Apollo, answered

Apollo is better when you need contact data, because the database, enrichment and sequences come in one per seat plan from $49 annual. Reply.io is better when you already have a list and reps run email, LinkedIn and calls in one sequence, since Multichannel at $99 per user includes a LinkedIn account and calling. For pure cold email at volume, neither is the cheapest sender.
On the plan card, yes: Apollo Basic is $49 per seat billed annually against $59 a month for Reply.io Email Volume. But Basic sends from 1 mailbox per user and 250 emails a day, so a team rotating several inboxes needs Professional at $79 per seat. Reply.io Email Volume allows unlimited users and mailboxes under fair use, which often makes it cheaper for a team.
Apollo caps the Free and Basic plans at 250 email sends a day and 1 mailbox per user. Professional and Organization lift both limits to unlimited daily sends and unlimited Google and Microsoft mailboxes, with 5 or 15 SMTP mailboxes per user. Your own mailbox provider and warm-up still set the safe volume per inbox.
Apollo lists Free at $0, Basic at $49, Professional at $79 and Organization at $119 per seat a month on annual billing, with Organization requiring three seats. Paid seats include 30,000, 48,000 or 72,000 credits a year, and unused credits expire each billing cycle. Monthly billing costs about 24 percent more than annual.
Reply.io lists Email Volume from $59 a month for 1,000 active contacts with unlimited users, Multichannel from $99 per user with five mailboxes, one LinkedIn account and calling, Agency from $166 and the AI SDR plan from $500. LinkedIn costs $69 a month per account and Calls and SMS $29 per user where the plan does not include them.
Not in the same way. Apollo adds LinkedIn steps as manual tasks and works through its Chrome extension, so a rep still does the LinkedIn action. Reply.io connects a LinkedIn account and runs the steps inside the sequence, with one account included per user on Multichannel and $69 a month per account on the email plans.
Yes, many teams do exactly that. They export or sync contacts from Apollo, or another data source, and run the sequence in Reply.io for its multichannel steps. The trade-off is two subscriptions and two places to manage contacts, which is why some teams pick one tool and accept its weaker half.
Deliverability depends mostly on your domains, authentication, list quality and volume per mailbox rather than the vendor. Apollo includes a deliverability suite and warm-up from Basic but limits Basic to one mailbox per user, which makes spreading volume harder. Reply.io offers warm-up through Mailtoaster.ai and sells pre-warmed mailboxes from $15 each.
Partly. Apollo includes an AI writing allowance and AI research on every plan, and Reply.io sells Jason, an AI SDR, from $500 a month. In both cases you still design the sequence. AutoMail researches each company and writes the opener and every follow-up for that prospect, priced flat per workspace from $24 a month annual.
If you already have a list and the gap is the copy, AutoMail is the alternative: it writes a researched 1:1 sequence for each prospect, sends from warmed and rotated inboxes, stops on reply and routes interested prospects to your booking link. It costs $49 a month or $24 annual on Starter, with unlimited seats and no credits.

Keep comparing

More head-to-head comparisons

Instantly vs Smartlead

Instantly vs Smartlead

The two most popular cold email platforms, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Instantly

Lemlist vs Instantly

Multichannel personalization versus high-volume email, compared, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Smartlead

Lemlist vs Smartlead

Multichannel personalization versus scale and white-label, compared, plus a third option.

Saleshandy vs Smartlead

Saleshandy vs Smartlead

Two flat-priced senders with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.

QuickMail vs Instantly

QuickMail vs Instantly

Unlimited seats and senders versus bundled lead data, compared, plus a third option.

Woodpecker vs Smartlead

Woodpecker vs Smartlead

Pay-per-prospect versus flat unlimited sending, compared, plus a third option.

Reply.io vs Lemlist

Reply.io vs Lemlist

Two multichannel platforms that both now sell unlimited-user email plans, priced from both vendors in October 2026.

Klenty vs Salesloft

Klenty vs Salesloft

An affordable sales engagement tool versus an enterprise revenue platform, compared, plus a third option.

Instantly vs Saleshandy

Instantly vs Saleshandy

Two high-volume cold email platforms with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Klenty vs QuickMail

Klenty vs QuickMail

A per-user sales engagement tool with a database versus a flat-priced sender with unlimited seats, compared, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Mailshake

Lemlist vs Mailshake

Two multichannel sales engagement tools with built-in lead data, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Woodpecker vs QuickMail

Woodpecker vs QuickMail

Two deliverability-first cold email tools with very different pricing models, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Saleshandy vs QuickMail

Saleshandy vs QuickMail

Two flat-priced cold email tools with unlimited inboxes, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Mailshake vs Saleshandy

Mailshake vs Saleshandy

Per-seat sales engagement versus flat unlimited-inbox sending, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Apollo vs Instantly

Apollo vs Instantly

A B2B database with sequencing versus a deliverability-first sender, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Smartlead vs Apollo

Smartlead vs Apollo

A deliverability-first sender versus a B2B contact database with sequencing, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Snov.io vs Hunter.io

Snov.io vs Hunter.io

Two find-verify-and-send suites compared on credits, seats and sending caps, plus a third option.

Woodpecker vs Dripify

Woodpecker vs Dripify

An email sender that added LinkedIn versus a LinkedIn tool that added email, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Dripify

Lemlist vs Dripify

Unlimited-user email against per-seat LinkedIn automation, with the cap LinkedIn actually enforces.

Apollo vs Snov.io

Apollo vs Snov.io

A per-seat sales database versus an unlimited-seat find-and-send suite, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Apollo

Lemlist vs Apollo

Flat unlimited-user email against a per-seat sales platform, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Apollo vs Hunter.io

Apollo vs Hunter.io

A 210M-contact database billed per seat against a precision finder billed per plan, plus a third option.

Saleshandy vs Apollo

Saleshandy vs Apollo

A workspace-priced sender with its own 852M-contact database against a per-seat sales platform, plus a third option.

Lemlist vs Clay

Lemlist vs Clay

A flat unlimited-user sequencer against a credit-metered data engine, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Saleshandy vs Lemlist

Saleshandy vs Lemlist

Two multichannel tools that meter opposite things, compared honestly, plus a third option.

Instantly vs Dripify

Instantly vs Dripify

Email volume you can buy more of against LinkedIn reach that money cannot raise.

Saleshandy vs Dripify

Saleshandy vs Dripify

Email volume you can buy more of against LinkedIn reach that money cannot raise.

Yesware vs Dripify

Yesware vs Dripify

Two cheap seats, two hidden ceilings: 20 recipients a month against 100 LinkedIn invites a week.

Klenty vs Dripify

Klenty vs Dripify

A per-seat sales engagement platform against a per-seat LinkedIn robot, priced from both vendors on the same day.

Smartlead vs Dripify

Smartlead vs Dripify

A high-volume email sender against a per-seat LinkedIn robot, priced from both vendor pages on the same day.

Snov.io vs Dripify

Snov.io vs Dripify

An email-first suite that sells LinkedIn as a per-slot add-on against a LinkedIn tool that bundles a little email, priced from both vendor pages.

Apollo vs Dripify

Apollo vs Dripify

The same $79 a seat buys a B2B database or a LinkedIn account. Here is what each one actually includes.

HeyReach vs Dripify

HeyReach vs Dripify

One prices the LinkedIn account, the other prices the rep. At eleven accounts that difference flips the bill.

Expandi vs Dripify

Expandi vs Dripify

Same $79 annual price at the top of Dripify and the bottom of Expandi. The weekly invitation ceiling is what differs.

Waalaxy vs Dripify

Waalaxy vs Dripify

Waalaxy is the cheaper LinkedIn seat, but email sequences sit on its top plan. Dripify puts email on every plan.

Dux-Soup vs Dripify

Dux-Soup vs Dripify

Dux-Soup repriced to $41.25 a seat and still has no email step. Dripify includes email on every plan from $39.

Linked Helper vs Dripify

Linked Helper vs Dripify

Linked Helper costs $8.25 a LinkedIn account on annual billing and runs on your own computer. Dripify costs $39 and runs in the cloud with email included.

PhantomBuster vs Dripify

PhantomBuster vs Dripify

PhantomBuster sells hours of automation for the whole workspace. Dripify sells a seat per LinkedIn account with email steps included.

Meet Alfred vs Dripify

Meet Alfred vs Dripify

Meet Alfred wins on annual price and channels. Dripify wins on monthly price and puts email on its cheapest plan.

HeyReach vs Lemlist

HeyReach vs Lemlist

One is LinkedIn at agency scale with no email. The other is email first with LinkedIn bolted on per user.

Expandi vs HeyReach

Expandi vs HeyReach

Same $79 for one LinkedIn account. From ten accounts up, one prices every seat and the other sells blocks of 25.

Waalaxy vs Expandi

Waalaxy vs Expandi

Waalaxy is the cheaper LinkedIn seat with email on its top plan. Expandi costs more per account and builds deeper sequences.

Waalaxy vs HeyReach

Waalaxy vs HeyReach

Waalaxy is the cheap per-user seat with email on its top plan. HeyReach prices per sender and gets cheap only when you run a lot of LinkedIn accounts.

Waalaxy vs Lemlist

Waalaxy vs Lemlist

Waalaxy is a LinkedIn tool that adds email on its top plan. Lemlist is an email tool that adds LinkedIn on its top plan. The price gap depends on which channel you need first.

Expandi vs Lemlist

Expandi vs Lemlist

Expandi is LinkedIn first with email follow-ups. Lemlist is email first with LinkedIn on its top plan. One seat of each costs within $10 of the other.

HeyReach vs PhantomBuster

HeyReach vs PhantomBuster

HeyReach charges per LinkedIn sender and runs the outreach. PhantomBuster charges per workspace for runtime and builds the list.

Waalaxy vs Linked Helper

Waalaxy vs Linked Helper

Waalaxy runs LinkedIn from its cloud and adds email on its top plan. Linked Helper runs on your own computer, costs less per account and never sends email.

Reply.io vs Instantly

Reply.io vs Instantly

Reply.io sells a multichannel sales engagement platform priced by contacts and seats. Instantly sells cold email volume with unlimited mailboxes, priced by emails sent.

Reply.io vs Smartlead

Reply.io vs Smartlead

Reply.io sells a multichannel sales engagement platform priced by contacts and seats. Smartlead sells cold email volume with unlimited mailboxes, priced by sends and contacts.

Skip the copywriting, keep the deliverability

AutoMail personalizes every email, rotates and warms your inboxes, follows up, pauses on reply and books meetings into your calendar and CRM. Flat monthly fee, not per-seat, permission-based by design.

See pricing

Flat pricing from $49/mo, no per-seat fees · 1-click unsubscribe in every email · CAN-SPAM and GDPR